Legal Opinion
State v. Flittie
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 1988No. 15736PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Justice.
Roger G. Flittie (defendant) appeals his conviction on grand theft and petty theft charges. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for re-sentencing.
ISSUES
Defendant, both through counsel and pro se, raises several issues in this appeal. We hold that the majority of the issues are totally lacking in merit. (Specifically, through his counsel, he claims that (1) the trial court erred in refusing his proposed jury instructions 3, 4, 5 and 7; and (2) his due process rights were violated by charg*2ing more than one offense in a single count in the indictment. In his pro se…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GarciaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- State of Iowa v. Bion Blake IngramSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- State v. PasekSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Cordell v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.