Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 2005No. NonePublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] David Lynn Anderson appealed the denial of a second motion to correct his 125-year sentence on a 1995 conviction for vehicular homicide. Defendant’s sentence was enhanced under the habitual offender provision after he pleaded guilty to a Part II Information that included a 1988 felony conviction for grand theft, and two 1990 felony drug convictions. Defendant contended his sentence was illegally enhanced using three prior felony convictions under SDCL 22-7-8.1, rather than two prior felony convictions under SDCL 22-7-7. Defendant argued his two 1990 felony…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. City of Colton v. SchwebachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Steinberg v. South Dakota Department of Military & Veterans AffairsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. State v. $1,010.00 IN AMERICAN CURRENCYSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Chapman v. ChapmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. RoedderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. PentecostSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API