Legal Opinion
Tiner v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided December 29, 1995No. 5:93-cv-00930PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
POOLER, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant General Motors Corporation (“GM”) moved for summary judgment dismissing all claims by plaintiffs Paula and Gregory Tiner (collectively, “the Tiners”). Paula Tiner (“Tiner”) claims that she injured her neck, upper back, chest, and knees when she drove a GM-manufactured 1991 Chevrolet Caprice into an unlit lamp pole in a parking lot. Tiner believes that GM’s defective design, manufacture, or installation of the air bag 1 and driver’s side seat belt in the Caprice was either the sole or a contributing cause of her…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Halloran v. Virginia Chemicals Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wood v. Toyota Motor Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Derienzo v. Trek Bicycle Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Pesce v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1996
- Bruno v. Toyotomi U.S.A., Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2001
- Jean M. Nemes and James Nemes v. Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. and Barnett Outdoors, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.