Legal Opinion
Bruno v. Toyotomi U.S.A., Inc.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided July 16, 2001No. 1:98-CV-1729PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
HURD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Kenneth Bruno (“Mr. Bruno”) and his wife, Mary Beth Bruno (“plaintiffs”)1 brought this diversity action, claiming that the defendants Toyotomi U.S.A., Inc. and Toyotomi Co., Ltd. (“defendants” or “Toyotomi”) are liable to them for property damage. The basis of the action is product liability. The defendants moved for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Oral argument was heard on May 25, 2001 in Albany, New York. Decision was reserved.
II. FACTS
Plaintiffs borrowed a kerosene heater manufactured by Toyotomi…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wechsler v. Hunt Health Systems, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Derienzo v. Trek Bicycle Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005