Legal Opinion

Covey Motor Car Co. v. Kliks

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

After alleging their qualifications, the plaintiffs state on the eighteenth day of July, 1923, *396and the seventeenth day of July, 1923, they furnished material and performed labor and skill upon the following described automobile to wit: One seven-passenger Cadillac automobile. The complaint then recites the proceedings to foreclose the lien under the statute and alleges that the defendant, B. A. Kliks, has or claims to have, some interest in said automobile. A copy of the lien notice containing an itemized account of the work done, and the materials furnished upon the automobile is attached to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Duby v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. McCann v. Oregon Scenic Trips Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Marx & Jorgenson v. CroisanOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Campen v. JamiesonWashington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. BristolOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Coast Engine & MacHine Works v. BarbeeOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Fletcher v. Southern Oregon Truck Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Gyllenberg v. HerizaOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Burns v. La FountaineOregon Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API