Legal Opinion

Marx & Jorgenson v. Croisan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1889PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Marion County.

1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.

This was an action in replevin. A demurrer was filed to the complaint, and specified as the grounds *394thereof, “that the same does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.” The court below overruled the demurrer, and the defendant refusing further to plead, judgment was rendered for the plaintiff. The objection is, that the complaint does not allege that the property seized was located in Marion County, in which the action was brought. It was argued that the action of replevin was local, and must be brought in the county where the property was taken and located, and that…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Beamish v. NoonOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Parrish v. ParrishOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Covey Motor Car Co. v. KliksOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Kohler & Chase Co. v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API