Legal Opinion

Fretwell v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 19, 1986No. CR 85-208PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Appellant was charged with capital murder. He realized that at trial the proof of guilt would be overwhelming. Under Arkansas law only a jury may impose the penalty of death, so appellant attempted to plead guilty to the court, but the prosecutor would not assent, and the court would not accept the plea. After the jury had been picked, appellant tried to plead guilty to the jury, skip the guilt or innocence phase of the trial, and proceed immediately with the sentencing phase of the bifurcated trial. The prosecutor objected and insisted on making his proof during the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Wicks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Grigsby v. MabryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. Carl Albert Collins v. A.L. Lockhart, Director of the Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  5. Grigsby v. MabryDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Bowen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Dansby v. HobbsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  4. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Buckley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API