Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Racine v. Dull

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1975No. 75-426PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In State, ex rel. Woodbury, v. Spitler (1974), 40 Ohio St. 2d 1, 3, followed in State, ex rel. Wentz, v. Correll (1975), 41 Ohio St. 2d 101, this court held:

í < * * * Where an action is pending and undetermined in a lower court of competent jurisdiction, and where there is otherwise an adequate remedy by way of appeal, this court has no authority to determine what judgment should be rendered by the lower court.”

In the instant case, relator has an adequate remedy by way of appeal.

Accordingly, on authority of State, ex rel. Woodbury, v. Spitler, supra, and State, ex rel. Wentz, v. Correll,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Woodbury v. SpitlerOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State ex rel. Wentz v. CorrellOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re SingerOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State ex rel. Dix v. AngelottaOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Lippert v. EngleOhio Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API