Lippert v. Engle
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Mandamus is not available where appellant has a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law by way of appeal. See State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141; State, ex rel. Woodbury, v. Spitler (1974), 40 Ohio St. 2d 1; State, ex rel. Racine, v. Dull (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 72; and In re Singer (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 130.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals, dismissing the complaint, is therefore affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Celebrezze, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State ex rel. Woodbury v. SpitlerOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- In re SingerOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State ex rel. Racine v. DullOhio Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by1 opinion
- State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983