Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dix v. Angelotta

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1985No. 84-950PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether a complaint for a writ of mandamus is the proper vehicle in which appellant’s claimed speedy trial right violation should be addressed. It is axiomatic that a writ of mandamus will only be issued when the aggrieved party has no adequate remedy at law. State, ex rel. Racine, v. Dull (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 72, 73 [73 O.O.2d 320], Additionally, this court has held that extraordinary writs, such as mandamus, may not be employed before trial as a substitute for appeal. State, ex rel. Woodbury, v. Spitler (1973), 34 Ohio St. 2d 134 [63 O.O.2d 229],…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Woodbury v. SpitlerOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State ex rel. Racine v. DullOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State ex rel. Hamilton v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State, Ex Rel. Baker v. HairOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State ex rel. Shepherd v. Ashtabula Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Davis v. Camplese, 2007-A-0082 (5-23-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API