Legal Opinion

Hilborn v. Bonney

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1915No. Civ. No. 1777PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

It appears from the complaint filed August 20, 1912, that plaintiff had theretofore, on August 9, 1912, in an action instituted against defendant Frank R. Bonney to recover damages for alleged fraud, obtained a judgment against him in the sum of four thousand dollars, upon which she caused to be issued an execution and a levy thereof made upon certain real estate described as lot 22 of the Huston Tract, in Los Angeles County, title to which real estate was at the time in the name of defendant Ella Bonney and upon which she, prior to the entry of the judgment against her husband, had filed a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barker v. BarkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Fitzell v. LeakyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Harding v. Atlantic Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Hanly v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. MansfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Jud Whitehead Heater Co. v. OblerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Gray v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Meyer v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Hoskins v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API