Legal Opinion

Jud Whitehead Heater Co. v. Obler

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1952No. Civ. 15030PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

These two actions, which were consolidated for trial, sought an accounting and to impress constructive trusts on certain real and personal property alleged to have been acquired by defendant Louis Obler * and his wife, defendant Bernice Obler, with moneys embezzled by him from the respective plaintiffs. From an amended judgment impressing such trusts, defendants appeal.

Questions Presented

1. Sufficiency of evidence to show wrongful taking.

2. Were the cases improperly consolidated?

3. Alleged error in allowing amendment of complaint to conform to proofs.

4. Was a part of plaintiffs’ claim barred…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Title Ins. and Trust Co. v. IngersollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Elizalde v. ElizaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Estate of McLellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Dabney v. PhilleoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. RyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Caffroy v. FremlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. London Homes, Inc. v. KornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Pollard v. PollardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Fiberchem, Inc. v. General Plastics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API