Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dunn v. McKay, Burton, McMurray & Thurman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1978No. 15208Published

1DissentMaughan, Justice

For the following reasons, I dissent.

It is necessary to reiterate the facts in order to compensate for omissions in the majority opinion, and to perceive the events on a sequential basis.

Plaintiff initiated an action for legal malpractice against defendants for their allegedly negligent representation of her in a divorce action.

The matter was tried before a jury; however, after plaintiff had presented her case, defendants moved for a directed verdict. Defendants successfully urged that conceding the issue of negligence for the purpose of the motion, plaintiff had failed to establish the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. McEvoy v. HeliksonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Peters v. SimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API