Legal Opinion

United States v. Klosterman

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 1957No. Cr. 18684, 18659PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAFT, District Judge.

The defendants, Klosterman, Deeney and Stafford, were jointly indicted in one indictment of two counts. The first count charged conspiracy, 1 in this and other judicial districts, (a) to defraud the United States, (b) to commit the offense of bribery 2 against the United States. Of the three overt acts described in this count, only one, by Klosterman, was alleged in this judicial district. The second count of the indictment charged bribery of one King, a Special Agent of the Intelligence Division of the Internal Revenue Service.

Defendant Deeney was also separately…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. On Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Goldman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Frederick W. Klosterman. United States v. John R. Deeney, Jr. United States v. Joseph A. StaffordCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  2. United States v. Deborah Delaplane, Paul Mosher and Michael O'BrienCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. RaffDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. United States v. JamesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
  5. United States v. Kimball Securities, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API