Legal Opinion

United States v. Deborah Delaplane, Paul Mosher and Michael O'Brien

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 2, 1985No. 84-1312, 84-1796 and 84-1798PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Circuit Judge.

These consolidated appeals are before us in accordance with Fed.Rules Cr.Proc. rule 11(b), 18 U.S.C. Under Rule 11(b), a defendant “may enter a conditional plea of guilty or nolo contendere, reserving in writing the right, on appeal from the judgment, to review of the adverse determination of any specified pre-trial motion.” Rule 11(b) also provides that if “the defendant prevails on appeal, he shall be allowed to withdraw his plea.”

Michael O’Brien (O’Brien), Paul Mosher (Mosher) and Deborah Delaplane (Delaplane) 1 were indicted on March 30, 1983, and charged with…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Osborn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. John L. MorrowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Deparvine v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. United States v. Thomas Alfred FlanaganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. MitroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Peter John LeoneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. McElroyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API