Legal Opinion

STANDARD ACCIDENT INS. CO. v. FRIEDENTHAL.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 1891PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

27 P. 88

1 Colo.App. 5

STANDARD ACCIDENT INS. CO.

v.

FRIEDENTHAL.

Court of Appeals of Colorado

June 23, 1891

Appeal from district court, Chaffee county.

[1 Colo.App. 6] It is alleged that on the 21st day of April, 1886, the appellant issued and delivered to Eugene H. Teats an accident insurance policy, to be effective for 12 months from its date, whereby Teats was to receive from the insurance company $25 a week for loss of time in consequence of any bodily injury sustained by him during the existence of such policy, through external, violent, and accidental means, which should wholly disable him…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. . the Atlantic Fire and Marine Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Pitney v. . Glen's Falls Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Post & Dowding v. Ætna InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Joliffe v. Madison Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Boehen v. . Williamsburgh Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1866

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Western Reciprocal Underwriters' Exchange v. CoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. German Insurance v. ShaderNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. National Mutual Fire Insurance v. SpragueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  4. Victoria Copper Mining Co. v. HawsUtah Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Lewis v. WinslowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API