Legal Opinion

Coon v. Froehlich

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 7, 1983No. C-3-81-337PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS FODAL AND DANIELS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DEFENDANTS FODAL AND DANIELS DISMISSED AS DEFENDANTS IN THIS ACTION; CLERK TO ENTER JUDGMENT FOR FODAL AND DANIELS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF; PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR COSTS OVERRULED AS TO DEFENDANT FROEHLICH; RULING DEFERRED AS TO DEFENDANTS BRAILEY AND McGRATH

RICE, District Judge.

This case arises out of the alleged removal of certain political signs. Plaintiff, a resident of Beavercreek, Ohio, was among those Beavercreek residents who were opposed to the adoption of a charter for their municipality. Shortly…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Hanrahan v. HamptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
  2. Beck v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  3. Balderaz v. PorterDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
  4. Pittman v. Cuyahoga Valley Career CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
  5. Jackson v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API