Wilburn v. Auto Exchange
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Chief Justice Sampson—
Affirming.
Appellant Wilburn was employed as a mechanic in the shops of the Auto Exchange, in Louisville, when a sliver of steel struck him in the eye and so injured it that he has since lost the sense of sight in it. At the time of the accident and injury both Wilburn and the Auto Exchange had accepted the benefits of the workmen’s compensation act and were operating thereunder. Immediately upon the happening of the injury Wilburn called the attention of his foreman to the fact and asked him to look in his eye and see if he could not remove the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bates & Rogers Construction Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
3Cited by13 opinions
- Schrabauer v. Schneider Engraving Product, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Williams Manufacturing Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Scott Tobacco Co. v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Turner, Day & Woolworth Handle Co. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Hay v. Swiss Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.