Ex parte Matthews
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
O’CONNOR, Justice.
On motion for rehearing, we withdraw our earlier opinion and substitute this. We deny the motion for rehearing. .
Jean Matthews, the appellant, contends her prosecution for perjury is barred by equitable estoppel, that the statute tolling the statute of limitations is unconstitutional, and that the preindictment delay in this case runs afoul of both the due process clause of the United States Constitution and the due course of law guarantee of the Texas Constitution. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Ex Parte CrispCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Ex Parte DickersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Ex Parte DelbertCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Ex Parte KellerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ex Parte MatthewsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Ex Parte MatthewsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Ex Parte Matthews, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
- Ex Parte MatthewsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Ex Parte MatthewsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.