Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte Matthews

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 12, 1994No. 243-93Published

1DissentClinton, Judge

There is no authority in our law for a pretrial habeas corpus attacking the validity of allegations in the charging instrument that the applicable tolling statute of limitations “as applied to the facts and circumstances of the present offense” is unconstitutional on several asserted grounds. Ex parte Matthews, 846 S.W.2d 152, at 154 (Tex.App.— Houston 1993).

The code of criminal procedure enumerates authorized pleadings of a defendant in Article 27.02, V.A.C.C.P. The first is “(1) A motion to set aside or an exception to an indictment or information for some matter of form or substance.”

Ground…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DickersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Ex Parte WardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Ex Parte MeyerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. Ex parte MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API