Ex Parte Matthews
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CLINTON, Judge.
Appellant was indicted for aggravated perjury, and she filed a pre-trial writ of habeas eoipus. She appealed to the First Court of Appeals after the trial court denied relief, claiming that prosecution on the indictment was barred by the two year statute of limitations applicable to aggravated perjury. Article 12.03(d), V.A.C.C.P.1 The court of appeals dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction, holding that appellant could not challenge an indictment in a pre-trial writ of habeas corpus proceeding. Ex parte Matthews, 846…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Heckert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Ex Parte WardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Ex Parte MatthewsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Proctor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Nguyen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Grotti v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Nguyen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.