In re Amey
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KRAVITZ, Associate Judge:
A judge of the Superior Court ordered appellant Maurice Ame/s involuntary civil commitment for one year under the Ervin Act after a jury determined that appellant was mentally ill and, as a result, likely to injure himself or others if not committed. On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court erred by allowing a psychiatrist testifying as an expert witness for the government to refer to hospital records and other hearsay information in explaining the bases of his opinions relating to appellant’s mental illness and dangerousness. In particular, appellant claims…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In the Matter of B.B., Alleged to Be Seriously Mentally Impaired, B.B.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Young v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- DeVita v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Cynthia Sanchez v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- IN RE KAREN PERRYDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.