Legal Opinion

DeVita v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 2013No. 12-CV-893PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Associate Judge:

Appellant James DeVita claims the Superior Court wrongfully denied his application for leave to appeal an administrative adjudication finding him liable for speeding. He argues that the traffic hearing abridged his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights because the adjudication was based exclusively on evidence provided by the Automated Traffic Enforcement System (“ATE System”). In the alternative, appellant asserts that, even if the penalty is civil, the administrative hearing provided by the Department of Motor Vehicles (“DMV”) denied him due process of law. We conclude,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shaw v. PattonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. Roosevelt Whitfield v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Charmed LLC v. DC DOHDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. In re The Bright Ideas Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. Ricciardi v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API