Legal Opinion

Stach v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 30, 1981No. 80-82PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mejda

Sears (defendant) appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motion for judgment against plaintiff notwithstanding the verdict (n.o.v.) or, in the alternative, for a new trial on plaintiff’s claim. Otis (third-party defendant) appeals from the granting of Sears’ motion for judgment n.o.v. against Otis on its third-party complaint, denial of Sears’ motion for judgment n.o.v. against plaintiff, and, alternatively, the failure to grant a new trial on plaintiff’s claim against Sears.

The issues presented are whether the trial court erred: (1) in allowing plaintiff to amend her complaint to…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Alvis v. RibarIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Flynn v. VancilIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Muhlbauer v. KruzelIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Gasbarra v. St. James HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Warren v. LeMayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. Bass v. Washington-Kinney Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Lee v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Northern Trust Co. v. University of Chicago Hospitals & ClinicsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. Wind v. Hy-Vee Food Stores, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API