Legal Opinion

Pravorne v. McLeod

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1963No. 4603PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, C. J.:

The question here involved for determination is whether the instrument herein referred to as a contract of purchase and sale was a completed contract, or whether it was merely an offer made by the McLeods to Pravorne to enter into a contract, which offer was rejected by Pravorne and a counteroffer made by him, which in turn was not accepted by the McLeods.

Under similar circumstances the law was very simply stated in Hargrave v. Heard Inv. Co., 56 Ariz. 77, 105 P.2d 520, 521, as follows:

“It is the law that when A offers B to enter into a contract on certain…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bleecker v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  3. Wichita Falls & N. W. R. Co. v. Overstreet & DockterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Foster v. West Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Geary v. Great AtLantic & Pacific Tea Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stonewood Hotel Corp. v. Davis Development, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Katz v. Pratt Street Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  3. Thomsen v. GlennNevada Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Gibson Lexbury LLP v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
  5. Jenkins v. James River Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API