Legal Opinion

Geary v. Great AtLantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1937No. 24044. Appellate Court reversed; municipal court affirmedPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Appellant, as assignee of a claim for rent, secured judgment thereon in the municipal court of Chicago against the appellee in the sum of $1750. The cause was tried on a stipulation of facts from which it appears that on February 25, 1931, appellee, then in possession of the premises, wrote to the Foreman Trust & Savings Bank, herein called the Foreman Bank, then receiver of the premises, as follows: “Re: 3309 W. Madison Street.

“Herewith original and duplicate copies of renewal lease for one year commencing May 1, 1931, at a monthly rental rate of $125.00 with one one-year renewal privilege…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Ullsperger v. MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Haas v. MyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Scutt v. La Salle County BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Milanko v. JensenIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Shapleigh Inv. Co. v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. Sjostrom & Sons, Inc. v. D. & E. Mall Restaurant, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API