Legal Opinion
Pasadena Investment Co. v. Peerless Casualty Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 18, 1955No. Civ. 20729PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.
Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment for defendant, which was entered after a demurrer to the complaint had been sustained and no amended complaint had been filed. The sole issue to be decided by this court is whether or not the allegations of the complaint state a cause of action against defendant under a forgery bond issued by it.
For convenience in reference, we will hereinafter refer to plaintiff as “Pasadena” and to defendant as “Peerless.”
The bond issued by Peerless to Pasadena indemnified Pasadena against “any loss . . . through having, in good faith and in the ordinary course of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- People v. BenditCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. ThornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gilbert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- State Bank of Poplar Bluff v. Maryland Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- The First National Bank of South Carolina of Columbia v. Glens Falls Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
- Century Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Security National Bank of Durand v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.