Legal Opinion

Medders v. Kroger Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 11, 2002No. A02A1288PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

Karen Lisa Medders appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to the Kroger Company on her slip and fall claim. Because the trial court correctly ruled that there was no evidence that Kroger had actual or constructive knowledge of the hazard, we affirm.

“To prevail [on summary judgment], the moving party must demonstrate that there are no genuine issues of any material fact and that the undisputed facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, support judgment as a matter of law.” Hutchins v. J. H. Harvey Co., 240 Ga. App. 582,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Robinson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  3. Alterman Foods, Inc. v. LigonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. Brown v. AmersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Matthews v. the Varsity, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Davis v. Bruno's Supermarkets, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Clay v. OxendineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Mucyo v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. State v. RozierSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  5. Freeman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API