Legal Opinion

Mucyo v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 11, 2009No. A09A2343PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

Chantal Mucyo filed a complaint against Publix Super Markets, Inc. in which she alleged that Publix’s negligence resulted in injuries she sustained when she fell inside one of its stores. Mucyo appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Publix, alleging that Publix had constructive knowledge of the foreign substance on its floor that caused her to fall. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.1 A de novo standard…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. Matthews v. the Varsity, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Haskins v. Piggly Wiggly Southern, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Medders v. Kroger Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Douglas v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. All American Quality Foods, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  2. Pirkle v. Quiktrip Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  3. Warner v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. Barbour-Amir v. Comcast of georgia/virginia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  5. Craig Brown v. georgiacarry.org, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API