Legal Opinion
Clay v. Oxendine
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 27, 2007No. A06A1695PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bernes, Judge.
The appellants in this case include numerous individuals and corporations who operate consumer cash advance and finance businesses in the State of Georgia. Appellees John Oxendine, the Industrial Loan Commissioner for the State of Georgia, and Thurbert E. Baker, the Attorney General for the State of Georgia (collectively, the “state”), commenced this civil action alleging that appellants’ use of a consumer “sale/leaseback” transaction violates the anti-payday lending statute, OCGA § 16-17-1 et seq., and the Georgia Industrial Loan Act, OCGA§ 7-3-1 et seq. (“GILA”). The state…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Amason v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Pope v. MarshallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- McKesson HBOC, Inc. v. AdlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- BankWest, Inc. v. OxendineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Western Sky Financial, LLC v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
- Georgia Cash America, Inc. v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Fulton County v. T-Mobile South, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Union Carbide Corp. v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Georgia Cash America, Inc. v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.