Legal Opinion

Yates v. Commercial Index Bureau, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 2012No. Civil Action No. 11-7488PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Stanley E. Yates, Jr. and Denyse Yates bring suit against Defendants Commercial Index Bureau, Inc. (“CIB”), Rockne F. Cooke, Gordon W. Rusinko,1 and National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“AMTRAK”), alleging federal claims of violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”) and state law claims of invasion of privacy and trespass. Defendants CIB, Cooke, and Rusinko (collectively, “CIB Defendants”) have filed a motion to dismiss all claims against them.2 For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Kathleen Buck v. The Hampton Township School District Lawrence C. Korchnak, DrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bamont v. Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to AnimalsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. CANADA v. SAMUEL GROSSI & SONS, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. DOE v. THE HOSPITAL OF UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. MORRISON v. HARVEY IIIDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API