Legal Opinion

CANADA v. SAMUEL GROSSI & SONS, INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 3, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01790Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSEPH CANADA, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. SAMUEL GROSSI & SONS, INC., NO. 19-1790 Defendant. DuBois, J. July 31, 2020 M E M O R A N D U M I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Joseph Canada, alleges in the Second Amended Complaint that defendant, Samuel Grossi & Sons, Inc. (“Grossi”), discriminated against him, retaliated against him, and subjected him to a hostile work environment because of his race and disability. The Second Amended Complaint also sets forth claims of retaliation and interference with plaintiff’s rights…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API