Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Soap Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 3, 1937No. Nos. 659, 687PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland

Section 602% of the Revenue Act of 1934, c. 277, 48 Stat. 680, 763, imposes a tax of 3 cents per pound upon the first domestic processing of coconut oil, and provides that all such taxes collected with respect to coconut oil wholly of Philippine production, etc., “shall be held as a separate fund and paid to the Treasury of the Philippine Islands, but if at any time the Philippine Government provides by any law for any subsidy to be paid to the pro ducers of copra, coconut oil, or allied products, no further payments to the Philippine Treasury shall be made under this subsection.”

Both…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Posadas v. National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Regan v. Taxation With Representation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API