Legal Opinion

Smith v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1991No. Docket 125966PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoctoroff, J.

Defendant appeals by leave granted from a January 15, 1990, order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed with modification the decision of a hearing referee granting compensation benefits to plaintiff. Defendant raises three issues involving the adequacy of the Appeal Board’s opinion. Defendant argues that the Appeal Board’s opinion fails to distinguish between situations where a preexisting condition merely manifests itself at work and situations where work aggravates a preexisting condition, that the Appeal Board failed to address defendant’s date-of-injury argument, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Franks v. White Pine Copper DivisionMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Aquilina v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. DeGeer v. DeGeer Farm Equipment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Nunn v. GA CANTRICK CO., INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Russell v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maner v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Rotondi v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Maner v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Maner v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Smith v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API