Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rotondi v. Chrysler Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 22, 1993No. Docket 143036, 143037PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The Second Injury Fund (sif) and Chrysler Corporation appeal a June 26, 1991, decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board. The wcab concluded that both the sif and Chrysler acted improperly in unilaterally reducing plaintiff’s weekly benefits.

Plaintiff was born on July 14, 1911. Plaintiff’s injury date is August 26, 1966. Plaintiff belongs to a special group of totally and permanently disabled employees with injury dates before July 1, 1968. See King v Second Injury Fund, 382 Mich 480; 170 NW2d 1 (1969). See Welch, Worker’s Compensation in Michigan: Law & Practice, § 13.8. Chrysler has…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Franks v. White Pine Copper DivisionMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hiltz v. Phil's Quality MarketMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Cruz v. Chevrolet Grey Iron Division of General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Pike v. City of WyomingMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  5. VanDeventer v. Michigan National BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Lincoln v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Lincoln v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Lincoln v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API