Legal Opinion

Russell v. General Motors Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 1988No. Docket 99815PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtP. D. Houk, J.

Plaintiff, Rita Russell, appealed from three decisions made by either hearing referee Russell E. Bine or Charles C. Conklin. On September 30, 1985, the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board affirmed all three decisions. Plain tiffs petition for leave to appeal to this Court was denied, as was her motion for reconsideration. Plaintiff applied for leave to the Supreme Court which, in lieu of granting leave, remanded the case to this Court for consideration as on leave granted. Russell v General Motors Corp, 428 Mich 879; 402 NW2d 483 (1987). We affirm the wcab’s decision.

The facts are not in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bower v. Whitehall Leather Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Edmond v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Hartsell v. Richmond Lumber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Steward v. Westran Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Aetna Life Insurance v. RooseMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Derr v. Murphy Motor Freight LinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. McJunkin v. Cellasto Plastic Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Nederhood v. Cadillac Malleable Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Lulgjuraj v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Maner v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API