Legal Opinion

Seeherman v. Wilkes-Barre City Zoning Hearing Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1979No. Appeal, No. 863 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

The instant appeal arises from a challenge to the substantive validity of a zoning ordinance enacted by the Council of the City of Wilkes-Barre which effected a change in a zoning district boundary from R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) to C-1 (Commercial Office). We reverse and remand to the Common Pleas Court.

Sambourne Street ran in a northwardly direction from Sullivan Street, parallel to South Main Street on its east and South Franklin Street on its west. Both sides of South Main Street were zoned for commercial use. Homes fronted on both sides of Sambourne…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Raum v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Pollock v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Berger v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Mont-Bux, Inc. v. RCJ McKINSTRYCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lower Allen Citizens Action Group, Inc. v. Lower Allen Township Zoning Hearing Board & Hempt Bros.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Laughman v. ZONING HEARING BD. OF NEWBERRY TOWNSHIPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Warner Co. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Cohen v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Korngold v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API