Legal Opinion

Mont-Bux, Inc. v. RCJ McKINSTRY

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 1976No. Appeal, 51 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Appellant, Mont-Bux, Inc., received tentative approval from the Board of Supervisors of Plumstead Township of its preliminary plan for the creation of a planned residential development. The Board of Supervisors attached no less than forty-eight conditions to its approval, all of which were accepted and agreed to be met by Mont-Bux, Inc. The appellees are protesting residents who appealed the Supervisor’s action of tentative approval to the Plumstead Township Zoning Hearing Board presumably pursuant to Sections 1005 and 1007 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Women's Homoeopathic Hospital of Philadelphia CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Driscoll v. Plymouth TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Neshaminy Plaza II v. KellyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Appeal of Hercek v. Whitehall Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Orleans v. Melrose Park Improvement Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Seeherman v. Wilkes-Barre City Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Racunas v. Ringgold School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. George Roscoe, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. In re DeLucaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Greenview v. Citizens Organized to Reclaim Chesterbrook, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API