Legal Opinion
Raum v. Board of Supervisors
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 25, 1975No. Appeal, Nos. 1322, 1323 and 1386 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
Consolidated for disposition are the appeals of landowner-developers and intervening protestants from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County invalidating Ordinance No. 267 of Tredyffrin Township under which landowners were granted preliminary approval of a development known as Chesterbrook in Tredyffrin Township and building permits to begin construction of an initial phase of Chesterbrook (Nos. 1322 and 1323 C.D. 1974), and which further denied intervening protestants’ standing to challenge the allegedly exclusionary impact of Ordinance No. 267…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Girsh AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Concord Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Cleaver v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Raum v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Baker v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Plaxton v. Lycoming County Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Stocks v. City of IrvineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Urban League of Essex Cty. v. Tp. of MahwahNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.