Holmes v. Bennett
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District, in and for the County of Maricopa. Edward Kent, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
On November 9, 1898, Joseph H. Holmes and wife, Sarah A. Holmes, being then residents of the city of Phoenix, Arizona, executed at said city to L. E. Payson their promissory note for $1,500, due two years after date thereof, and also on said date executed to said Payson, to secure the payment of said note, their mortgage on certain property in said city particularly described in the complaint in this suit. In October, 1902, the said Joseph H. Holmes removed from Arizona and did not at any time thereafter reside in Arizona. On or about May 5, 1909, the said Holmes and wife sold a portion of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schmucker v. SibertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Johns v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wooster v. ScorseArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Shiflet v. MarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1941
- Seale v. BerrymanArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Michener v. Standard Accident InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Foster v. BaumanArizona Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.