Legal Opinion

Seale v. Berryman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1935No. Civil No. 3575PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

— This is an appeal by E. C. Seale and Clara L. Seale, his wife, hereinafter called defendants, from a final judgment rendered against them and in favor of H. W. Berryman, as plaintiff. The facts, with perhaps one material exception, are not in dispute and may be stated as follows: On May 22, 1925, Charles E. English and his wife, who were then the owners of certain real property situate in Maricopa county, executed their promissory note for $1,250 due three years after date in favor of C. M. Berryman, and to secure the payment thereof gave a mortgage on the property above referred to.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pratt v. BuckleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  2. Coyle v. DavisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Sexton v. PickettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Holmes v. BennettArizona Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Metcalf v. Phoenix Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lane Title and Trust Company v. BrannanArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Del Rio Land, Inc. v. HaumontArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Best Fertilizers of Arizona, Inc. v. BurnsArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. MGIC Financial Corp. v. H. A. Briggs Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. Western Coach Corp. v. RoscoeArizona Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API