United States v. Bluewater-Toltec Irrigation District
District Court, D. New Mexico
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BALDOCK, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes on for consideration of defendant Atkinson Trading Co., Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss. The court, having reviewed the accompanying memoranda submitted by the parties (document nos. 999, 1253 and 1259), the relevant law and otherwise being advised fully in the premises, finds that the motion is well taken and should be granted.
This involved water litigation began on December 22, 1982, with the filing of the complaint by the United States in its own right and on behalf of the Acoma and Laguna Indian Pueblos. Some 1,388 defendants…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McDonald v. MabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Gerald Alger and Frelove Alger v. Larry HayesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Prather v. Raymond Const. Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1983
- Chronister v. Sam Tanksley Trucking, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ackermann v. LevineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Donaghy v. RoudebushDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1985