Legal Opinion

Nicholas v. Harger-Haldeman

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 1961No. Civ. 6474PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.

Plaintiff, cross-defendant, cross-complain ant and respondent (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff) brought this action against defendant, cross-complainant and appellant Harger-Haldeman (hereinafter referred to as defendant) for conversion of listed personal property consisting of wearing apparel, suitcases, paintings and supplies, a gun, cameras, phonograph and radio, etc., of a claimed value of $4,827.10.

Defendant answered, admitted it repossessed a Chrysler automobile which had formerly been sold under contract to plaintiff and there were contained therein certain listed objects of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Lynch v. BirdwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Jentick v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Fageol Truck & Coach Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Hoppin v. MunseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Orr v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Superior Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API