Legal Opinion
Gonzalez v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided March 12, 2013No. Civil Action No. H-12-1412PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MELINDA HARMON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in the above referenced products liability case, removed from state court and alleging strict products liability, breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty, gross negligence, and negligence relating to Defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s (“Bayer’s”) contraceptive drug-releasing intrauterine system Mirena® (“Mirena”) and intrauterine contraceptive device (“IUD”), is Bayer’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (instrument # 4).
Bayer removed this case on…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In Re Katrina Canal Breaches LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re Corrline International, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
- McKay v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2013
- Elmazouni v. Mylan, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2016
- Benefield v. Pfizer Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Cage v. Smith (In re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.