Antonetti v. Filson
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 JOSEPH ANTONETTI, Case No. 3:17-cv-00621-MMD-CLB 7 Petitioner, ORDER 8 v. 9 FILSON, et al., 10 Respondents. 11 12 I. SUMMARY 13 Before the Court is Respondents’ motion to dismiss (the “Motion”) certain grounds 14 in Joseph Antonetti’s habeas corpus petition, brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, because 15 they are unexhausted or procedurally barred (ECF No. 25). Antonetti opposed (ECF No. 16 40), and Respondents replied (ECF No. 41). As discussed below, the Court will grant the 17 Motion in part. 18 II. BACKGROUND 19 A jury…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.