In re Kinzel
New York Supreme Court
Application under the Liquor Tax Law to revoke and cancel a liquor tax certificate.
1Opinion of the CourtDavy, J.
This is a motion to revoke and cancel a liquor tax certificate, No. 13,865, issued to Michael Malone, the keeper of a hotel at No. 93 Front street, in the city of Rochester, on the ground that said Malone, on Sunday, the 14th day of May, 1899, permitted his servants to sell liquor to a number of persons who were not guests of the hotel.
The two principal questions in this case are, first, did the servants of said Malone sell liquor to persons on the Sabbath who were not guests of the hotel; second, were such sales made without his knowledge and consent.
It appears from the evidence that two of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lee v. . the Village of Sandy HillNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Verona Central Cheese Co. v. . MurtaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- In re LymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
3Cited by6 opinions
- H. G. Bittleston Law & Collection Agency v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Barrett v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Lyman v. Erie County Athletic ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- In re CullinanNew York Supreme Court · 1904
- In re CullinanNew York Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.