Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Dey
U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa
In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction. Under the provisions of chapter 28, Laws 22d Gen. Assem. Iowa, the defendants, as railroad commissioners of said state, on the 14th day of June last, made a schedule of reasonable maximum rates of charges for the transportation of freight and cars on the railroads in the state of Iowa, and also made a classification of freight to accompany and be a part of the schedule of rates so made.
Read the full summary
In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction. Under the provisions of chapter 28, Laws 22d Gen. Assem. Iowa, the defendants, as railroad commissioners of said state, on the 14th day of June last, made a schedule of reasonable maximum rates of charges for the transportation of freight and cars on the railroads in the state of Iowa, and also made a classification of freight to accompany and be a part of the schedule of rates so made. Acting under the provisions of section 17, they caused notice to he .published in the Daily News, and in the Iowa Capital, daily newspapers published in the…
1Opinion of the CourtBbeweii, J.
Tliis is a bill filed by the complainant, a railroad corporation, organized under the laws of the state of Illinois, against Peter A. Dey and others, they being the railroad commissioners of the state of Iowa, and seeks to enjoin them from putting in force a certain schedule of rates prepared by them for all transportation within the limits of the state. The matter is now submitted on an application for a preliminary injunction. The defendants have filed a protest, something in the nature of a plea to the jurisdiction, in which they represent that they have no personal interest in the matter;…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- In Re AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Poindexter v. GreenhowSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- People v. McMurchyMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Southern Railway Co. v. MeltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- State ex rel. Taylor v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.