Legal Opinion
Bohlin v. Jungbauer
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 27, 1993No. 43A03-9210-CV-339PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Judge.
The trial court granted Steven and Erin Jungbauers’ (the “Jungbauers”) motion for summary judgment and ordered specific performance of a purchase agreement between the Jungbauers and James Bohlin and Jane Richardson (the “Bohlins”). The order also, required the Bohlins to pay $20,-945.18 in damages. The Bohlins appeal $18,578.68 of the damages. The Bohlins raise two issues for our review which we consolidate and restate as whether the trial court erred in awarding “damages” to the Jungbauers following the decree for specific performance.
We reverse and remand.
On March 23, 1991,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arnold v. Leahy Home Building Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Lewandowski v. BeverlyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Bush v. CatheyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
- Radio Distributing Co. v. National Bank & Trust Co. of South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- North v. NewlinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Humphries v. AblesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Stoll v. GrimmIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Kaghann's Korner, Inc. v. Brown & Sons Fuel Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- UFG, LLC v. Southwest Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Estate of Collins v. McKinneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.