Legal Opinion
Stoll v. Grimm
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 19, 1997No. 09A05-9608-CV-332PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHARPNACK, Chief Judge.
Richard and Kathryn Stoll (collectively the “sellers”) appeal the entry of judgment in favor of Fred and Evelyn Grimm (collectively the “purchasers”), ordering specific performance of an agreement for the sale of real estate, abatement of the agreed purchase price, and payment of attorney fees. The sellers raise three issues for our review, which we restate as:(1) whether the trial court properly ordered specific performance of the contract;(2) whether the trial court properly ordered a reduction of the purchase price to represent damages under constructive…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scott v. Bodor, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Paramo v. EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Posner v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Mullen v. CogdellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Coffey v. WiningerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Welborn Clinic, an Indiana Business Trust Doing Business as Welborn Clinic v. Medquist, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Allison v. Union Hospital, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Marathon Oil Co. v. CollinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Estates of Kalwitz v. KalwitzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Lightning Litho, Inc. v. Danka Industries, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.