Legal Opinion

Barker Bros. Construction v. Bureau of Safety & Regulation

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 1995No. Docket 151397PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent issued three citations to petitioner for alleged violations of the Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Act (miosha), MCL 408.1001 et seq.; MSA 17.50(1) et seq. The citations were affirmed by the Board of Health and Safety Compliance and Appeals, and the decision of the board was affirmed by the Ingham Circuit Court. Petitioner appeals as of right, and we affirm.

i

Petitioner Barker Brothers Construction is a small construction business owned and operated by brothers Daniel and David Barker, who have not formalized the business as either a partnership or a corporation. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Robert B. Reich, United States Secretary of Labor v. Trinity Industries, Inc., Respondent-Cross Occupational Safety and Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  2. People v. HegedusMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Auten v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  4. General Motors Corp. v. Bureau of Safety & RegulationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Gallie v. Detroit Auto Accessory Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lewis v. LeGrowMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Heinz v. Chicago Road Investment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Bennett v. WeitzMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Hottmann v. HottmannMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Mackey v. Department of Human ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API